Affirmative action redux: Prop. 209′s impact on labor and employment
The Equal Justice Society and UCLA School of Law hosted a Symposium on the labor and employment impact of California’s anti-affirmative action law — Prop. 209. Several research papers were presented, including:
A Vision Fulfilled? The Impact of Proposition 209 on Equal Opportunity for Women Business Enterprises
Monique W. Morris, Michael D. Sumner, Jessica Z. Borja
Affirmative Action Programs and Business Ownership among Minorities and Women
Robert Fairlie, Justin Marion
Diversity Management in America and the Affirmative Action Debate in France
Christine Pauwels
The Effectiveness of Affirmative Action in Highway Procurement
Justin Marion
Free to Compete? Measuring the Impact of Proposition 209 on Minority Business Enterprises
Monique W. Morris, Sirithon Thanasombat, Michael D. Sumner, Sara Pierre, Jessica Z. Borja
The Impact of State Affirmative Procurement Policies on Minority- and Women- Owned Businesses in Five States
Tim Lohrentz
Minority Preferences In Public Contracts
Christopher M. Westhoff, Jess J. Gonzalez
Using Race or Ethnicity as Factors in Employee and Contractor Outreach
David Benjamin Oppenheimer
* * *
In related news, UCLA Professors Cheryl Harris and Walter Allen wrote an Op-Ed in the National Law Journal highlighting the flaws in the “mismatch thesis”, which purports to demonstrate empirically that “affirmative action in law schools hurts black law students because it puts them in schools where their credentials are below the median; consequently, they cannot academically compete.” Professors Harris and Allen note that the “mismatch thesis” has not been subject to peer review and numerous questions remain about the accuracy of the thesis.
The Equal Justice Society published a point-by-point response to Pr. Sander’s 2004 article, which appeared in the Stanford Law Review. Other responses can be found at http://www.equaljusticesociety.org/research.html.
