Digital divide draws lines by color, class, geography
A recent piece from Colorlines highlights the digital divide between those with access to broadband internet and those navigating the internet from mobile devices such as smartphones. This divide is increasingly separating internet users along race, class, and geographic lines. Moreover, as Colorlines points out, differential regulatory treatment between the two types of access may create a second-class internet for cell phone users.
Cell phones are a vastly more affordable way to access the internet than broadband access through a computer–and sometimes, broadband access is simply unavailable. Quite possibly as a result of the relative affordability of cell phone access, the number of people of color adopting smartphones is growing faster than their white counterparts. Moreover, people of color rely more heavily on cell phone-based web access. Colorlines reports that 18% of blacks and 16% of Latinos now use cell phones as their exclusive means of internet access, as compared to just 10% of whites. At the same time, while 33% of whites use their phones to surf the web, 51% of Latinos and 46% of blacks do.
Rural households are disproportionately affected by the digital divide, too. According to the FCC, at least 20 million people in the U.S. lack access to broadband internet–and 73% of those reside in rural America. For all Americans, access to the internet is about much more than surfing the web: people now rely on the internet to pay bills, renew driver’s licenses, apply for jobs, unemployment insurance, or food stamps, and engage in the political and electoral processes.  Rural households may have unique needs for internet access, such as to connect to health care providers who maintain offices a great distance away. (The FCC has acknowledged this need through its pilot Universal Services Program for Rural Health Care Providers, designed to help defray the heightened costs of installing broadband internet in rural and remote areas.)
So, why is cell phone-based internet service inferior to broadband? The FCC names a few reasons, including that broadband allows more content to be transmitted, enables high-quality internet features that are incompatible with dial-up service, and is always “on” and does not block a phone line. Colorlines highlights an additional reason: while recent “net neutrality” legislation regulates companies when they are providing broadband access, it does not regulate those providing access via mobile devices. This means that, while telecommunications companies cannot prioritize what information travels faster or slower over their broadband connections, there are no such restrictions on how companies control access to or passage of information over cell phone-based internet service.
Without equivalent net neutrality for cell-phone based internet service, Colorlines suggests we may well see the emergence of a second-class internet for people of color, poor people, rural households and others who lack access to broadband.

